Showing posts with label Bullshit. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bullshit. Show all posts

Monday, May 5, 2008

Flashback: All Of Iraq's Provinces By November

A successful strategy for Iraq goes beyond military operations. Ordinary Iraqi citizens must see that military operations are accompanied by visible improvements in their neighborhoods and communities. So America will hold the Iraqi government to the benchmarks it has announced.

To establish its authority, the Iraqi government plans to take responsibility for security in all of Iraq's provinces by November. To give every Iraqi citizen a stake in the country's economy, Iraq will pass legislation to share oil revenues among all Iraqis. To show that it is committed to delivering a better life, the Iraqi government will spend $10 billion of its own money on reconstruction and infrastructure projects that will create new jobs. To empower local leaders, Iraqis plan to hold provincial elections later this year. And to allow more Iraqis to re-enter their nation's political life, the government will reform de-Baathification laws, and establish a fair process for considering amendments to Iraq's constitution. -- George W. AWOL Bush Whitehouse.gov January 2007
Phase 3. Profit!

Iraq 2008, Now With More Dead People!!
There's more...

Monday, December 10, 2007

WGA Strike: AMPTP Screwing All Unions



I ate breakfast at my favorite joint this morning, wearing my WGAw Strike shirt.

The waitress was on our side after I'd talked maybe two minutes. Two and a half cents. It's only fair.

But that isn't what I want to write about today.

Two issues, no, three.

First, let's talk more about why Chris Lehane is a scab.

United Hollywood

As of last week, the AMPTP retained the powerhouse "crisis management" firm of Fabiani and Lehane (known in political circles as "the Masters of Disaster." )They also have "a reputation for hardball tactics in damage control and inflicting damage on opponents."

This firm has built a reputation and a substantial income largely from Democratic, progressive political causes. A short list of their past employers includes Al Gore, Bill and Hillary Clinton, Michael Moore/Miramax (for Fahrenheit 9/11 and Sicko), and my personal favorite, the Screen Actors Guild. Founding partner Chris Lehane is currently a consultant for the Californians for Fair Election Reform, a major Democratic group, among other things.

My DC lobbyist friends tell me that for emergency “crisis management,” firms like Fabiani & Lehane charge as much as $100,000 dollars a month. But the AMPTP is also paying Steve Schmidt, a veteran Republican-leaning PR guru. He could easily cost another $100,000 a month.

My concern is this: no one hires crisis management firms at such huge expense if they’re planning on making a fair deal. A fair deal doesn't require hundreds of thousands of dollars of spin to sell. A fair deal is its own good PR.

The WGA hasn’t hired a huge PR firm. We don’t want to “spin” anyone. United Hollywood is an all-volunteer blog, and our PR strategy is simple: we tell the truth.

The truth is, we’re fighting for the future for all working people in Hollywood.

The truth is, new media coverage and internet residuals are vital to the income of writers, directors and actors.

The truth is, the below-the-line unions rely on residuals to fund over half of their pension and health plans, and their rate is tied directly to ours. If we lose, their P&H will likely be decimated.

The truth is, if we don’t get coverage for new media productions, the below the line unions won’t get it either. If we lose, they lose.

This strike is a disaster for the working men and women of California, and many other regions that rely on the entertainment industry for jobs. We didn’t want this strike. And the AMPTP could stop it tomorrow because our proposals are affordable and reasonable.

But instead of making a fair deal with us, they hire Fabiani & Lehane. The proposal gets a snazzy new name, the CEO's take out new ads and tell everyone how great their proposal is. Except that then, they don't give it to us. Remember the second half of the proposal they said we'd have on Tuesday? We still haven’t gotten it. Hard to negotiate without the offer. And it's becoming clear they don't intend to give it to us -- one theory being that they're stalling, looking for an opportunity to walk out of the talks and blame the WGA leadership for it.

It's time for the CEO's to stop playing PR games and get a deal done.

When Fabiani & Lehane worked for SAG in 2002, Lehane said at the time:
“... we believe strongly in the need to preserve the strength of the union and this agreement does that. We both come from liberal, progressive backgrounds, and this union represents working people."
For the record, so does the WGA, which is why SAG is our ally. And yet, right now Chris Lehane is helping the conglomerates try to divide this union internally and orchestrate ways to get us to question our leadership.

In other words, Chris Lehane is union busting.

And since Lehane and his firm have made their fortune – and continue to make it – off of Democratic Party connections and progressive causes, I think the hypocrisy here is pretty appalling.

Below is the contact info for the three frontrunners for the Democratic presidential nomination. Hillary Clinton, who says she supports the writers in this strike, has worked extensively with Fabiani & Lehane. Barack Obama and John Edwards also support the strike, and they work with many of the organizations that Fabiani & Lehane rely on for their business.

Call these 3 candidates, and politely ask them to promise to hold Fabiani & Lehane accountable for what they are doing.

Tell Clinton, Edwards and Obama this:

"As long as Fabiani & Lehane are in the business of union-busting, we want your personal assurance that they will not be in the business of working with Democratic organizations, businesses, politicians or candidates.

A strike is not a business opportunity to make a profit by harming the interests of working men and women."

Hillary Clinton (213) 908-0190 socalhrc@hillaryclinton.com

John Edwards (919) 636-3131 info@johnedwards.com

Barack Obama (866) 675-2008

The AMPTP likes to say that this is all about business. Well, the business of hypocrisy shouldn’t pay.
I think that pretty much handles the issue of Chris "the fucking Scab" Lehane.

There are consequences for being a scab.

One of them is that NO ONE, ever, ever, ever, EVER, fucking EVER works with you again. You're fucking DEAD to us now.

That's how you enforce Union discipline. Cross a picket line as a member of the Union, fight against a union, you're fucking through with that union. This guy claims to be a progressive, but he's working with the goddamn studios to try and bust the WGA?

He needs to be made an example of. No Democratic organization, no one on our side of the aisle gets to EVER use him or his company again, even to clean up after a botched race for dog-catcher. I swear by the sacred ovaries of Penélopê, we need to bring this mother-fracker down.

Item the second. It's been clear all week, the Studios have been planning to fuck with us, to build us up, then to pull the rug out. They're toying with the writers' emotions, trying to play divide the writers and turn them against each other, so they can get people to accept a bad deal in the end.

This is NOT going to work. I swear these folks will stay out for a YEAR if that is what it takes to shove this crap up the studio's ass. This is for all the marbles and the longer this lasts, the angrier everyone is getting. No writer is backing down.

As usual, Nikki has all the answers:
Deadline Hollywood

EXCLUSIVE: I wish I had better news about the AMPTP-WGA contract negotiations, but I don't. To sum up, they suck. I took extra time reporting tonight, and some very surprising developments came to light.

For instance, Peter Chernin is privately telling Hollywood that the producers plan to quit the talks any day now. That they have no intention of coming back with another streaming proposal "until we are close". And that they'll only give a better electronic sell-through formula "at the last minute" when a contract with the writers is virtually signed.

These quiet remarks by the Fox/News Corp No. 2 are the complete opposite of what the AMPTP is telling the WGA around the bargaining table.

I'm told Thursday's talks began at 10 AM, and both the WGA and AMPTP had a brief discussion about streaming, made-for-web content pay and jurisdiction, and electronic sell-through. Then one of the negotiators from the network and studio CEOs' side declared, "The DVD formula is good for you, and you should embrace it with open arms."

The bigwigs have even concocted this fiction that they wanted to solve the strike in three intense days of negotiations before Christmas but now they see that's impossible because of the level of mistrust and misunderstanding around the table. My sources tell me the CEOs seem to be looking for any excuse to blame WGA chief negotiator Dave Young specifically for "blowing it".

But the truth is this: the Hollywood moguls have not delivered on their promises. And Chernin's statements make clear they never had any intention of doing so right now. Days are passing, and the AMPTP still hasn't come back with a counter/counter-offer to the WGA's counter-offer to the AMPTP's offer on streaming. Days are passing, and the AMPTP still hasn't come back with the 2nd half of its New Media proposal presumably containing ESTs. Days are passing, and the AMPTP and WGA are still paralyzed on Internet issues, which is why they moved way down their list to the subject of Reality TV jurisdiction. Sure that angered the CEOs who own a network -- and I think it was a giant mistake by the writers' negotiating team to get off New Media and onto that. But it came up because of the AMPTP's stalling tactics, and the two sides had to jawbone about something.

In conclusion, I wouldn't be at all surprised if, as soon as Friday, the AMPTP walks out of the talks with a news release in hand that it's all the WGA's fault.
And sure enough, Nikki was right on the money...
United Hollywood

Moguls Break Off Talks Without Real Offer

As of right now, the Moguls have broken off the talks with a very long, very prepared and very nasty statement. It's also full of half-truths and outright lies.

It clearly took someone some time to write, and a lot of thought has gone into crafting it for maximum potential dissent within the ranks. It's a PR doc, and it's very well-written. You don't create something like this in ten minutes, or even an hour. This kind of thing takes days, especially if a large group of CEO's have to sign off on it.

So they've been planning this for a while. Which doesn't speak to good faith in the negotiation on their side.

One of the sticking points, apparently, was our leadership's refusal to promise they would cross a SAG picket line. It certainly appears that someone is planning for another strike sometime soon. And they want to crush that union, too. Assuming, of course, that they can crush us.

We're going to have more on this soon, but right now, all I can say is: remember that a very, very expensive consultant has orchestrated all of this for precisely one reason -- to win. This isn't about the moguls being "reasonable" or protecting the internet streaming business (that is really so laughable it was almost impossible to type) or any of the things that document talks about.

It's about winning. And they can only win if we let it happen.

Stay strong, we'll have more soon.
Also this...
United Hollywood
This is the letter that was just sent to the membership:

WGA's Response to AMPTP Breaking Off Talks

Today, after three days of discussions, the AMPTP came back to us with a proposal that included a total rejection of our proposal on Internet streaming of December 3.

They are holding to their offer of a $250 fixed residual for unlimited one year streaming after a six-week window of free use. They still insist on the DVD rate for Internet downloads.

They refuse to cover original material made for new media.

This offer was accompanied by an ultimatum: the AMPTP demands we give up several of our proposals, including Fair Market Value (our protection against vertical integration and self-dealing), animation, reality, and, most crucially, any proposal that uses distributor’s gross as a basis for residuals. This would require us to concede most of our Internet proposal as a precondition for continued bargaining. The AMPTP insists we let them do to the Internet what they did to home video.

We received a similar ultimatum through back channels prior to the discussions of November 4. At that time, we were assured that if we took DVD’s off the table, we would get a fair offer on new media issues. That offer never materialized.

We reject the idea of an ultimatum. Although a number of items we have on the table are negotiable, we cannot be forced to bargain with ourselves. The AMPTP has many proposals on the table that are unacceptable to writers, but we have never delivered ultimatums.

As we prepared our counter-offer, at 6:05 p.m., Nick Counter came and said to us, in the mediator’s presence: “We are leaving. When you write us a letter saying you will take all these items off the table, we will reschedule negotiations with you.” Within minutes, the AMPTP had posted a lengthy statement announcing the breakdown of negotiations.

We remain ready and willing to negotiate, no matter how intransigent our bargaining partners are, because the stakes are simply too high. We were prepared to counter their proposal tonight, and when any of them are ready to return to the table, we’re here, ready to make a fair deal.

John F. Bowman
Chairman, WGA Negotiating Committee
Contract 2007
Here's the take away.

The corporations are trying to mind-fuck the writers into accepting a bad deal. Anything less that steely resolve at every step along the picket line, will be met with contempt and a good rogering by these sociopathic fucks.

No blinking, no giving in, no avoiding responsibility. Our intent here is to make these six corporate entities, their principle stockholders and advertisers, and the people running the studios, hurt. Badly. And not blink at all while doing so.

They would strip us, our families, and all future writers, actors, directors, and every other creative guild of our pensions, health benefits, and pay from all future media streams, forever. Without even hesitating. And get their rocks off too.

Our job is to beat them down so hard no corporation EVER fucks with the creatives, ever again. That two hundred years from now, this lesson is still remembered and taught in B schools as:

"Some wars are not worth fighting, some people should never be attacked. The people who invent whole worlds and juggle them as their personal play-toys, while determining our cultural sense of ourselves, are NOT people to fuck with. Ever. They just might decide to write us out of the story. Which in the end, is what happened to the value of the Studios... the Writers jointly started telling new stories about who Producers and Studios were, and lo and behold, the Studios discovered they suddenly Just.Weren't.Needed.Anymore. Took less than a year. The strike ended with the studios begging the writers to come back to work on any terms, an unconditional surrender. The writers said no, and the studios went out of business. Welcome to the internet and direct distribution. Which is how the writers, directors and actors, took back control of their own destinies, and set the stage for a new artistic renaissance."

This vision of the future, will only happen through fighting the bullshit every day, and by not stupidly surrendering anything now. (*waves to Alec Baldwin*)

This matters. It is for the future of modern culture and the right to not have six corporations who don't give a shit about anything that matters, control entertainment for the next hundred years.
There's more...

Thursday, December 6, 2007

WGA Strike: Same Old Same Old


Screenwriter Irving Brecher
Meet Me In St. Louis, Bye Bye Birdie, Marx Brothers At The Circus & Go West, Life of Riley, and more.

The WGA Strike drags on.

Yesterday, the WGA put the Reality writers on the table, demanding to represent the writers who write Reality Television.

As Reality TV is a large part of what the Studios are relying on to get them through the strike, this is akin to threatening to take away the Studio's big gun in any future strike.

"No -- leave my penis alone. I NEED it." "Oh please, we're very GLBT friendly. Here -- go watch Topgun. But only on DVD. Streaming Internet Topgun doesn't pay residuals."

In other news, here is part of why the Studios are fighting so hard against the writers on this new media stuff... because if the writers get the four cent raise per DVD they're asking for -- the 2.5% raise that is 20+ years overdue -- because that same raise will be reflected in the contracts for SAG and DGA and other unions, plus pension fund, health benefits, and other payouts, the actual cost will come to almost 10 times the four cent per DVD sold.

Did I just say, instead of an extra four cents per DVD, the Studios would have to pay an extra almost 40 cents per DVD? Yep. The numbers are all nicely laid out by Digital Media Law in a post first done at Huffington.

Can the Studios afford it? Abso-fucking-lutely. Yes. You betcha. Yes Ma'am. Yep. No kidding, yeah, ya'huh, and that's right! Ice... man.

The total cost per studio per year of this proposed raise for all of the contracts combined -- WGA, DGA AND SAG -- isn't even the cost of ONE middle-of-the-road movie per year, let alone the cost of advertising the movie. It's a no brainier. Which explains of course, why the Studio executives are fighting it so hard.

This video below shows who the executives are fighting against. It's you and me, and every other working stiff. It's the Union...

Who's On The Line



Where do I go to get strike news?

UnitedHollywood.com.
Nikki Finke.

And most importantly, from...

LateShowWritersOnStrike.Com (Who ain't so damn funny.)


Updated 9:15 AM PT:

Holy Shit is Alec Baldwin Fucking Stupid.

Alec Baldwin suggests the writers go back to work and let the negotiations keep going.
Huffington Post

The strike should end now. The writers should go back to work. Continue negotiating, but go back to work. The report in yesterday's New York Times about NBC buying blocks of programming from "outside producers" is a view to our future. Just as MOWs were killed off the networks and original movies became the exclusive realm of the cable broadcasters, one can envision a future where more scripted programming moves to cable. Eventually, HBO and Showtime, et al, may become the place to find the bulk of scripted shows. With these people calling the shots, anything is possible.

In the meantime, the writers, and the other sellers as well, have a different idea they can try. I recall when a popular late night talk show host skewered the head of his own network for a prolonged run, right there on his show. On and on it went and, from what I heard, that network head was apoplectic. These people have bigger egos than even the stars themselves, but without any sense of humor. I want the WGA to set up a website and on that website we can all post stories about every no-talent, idiotic, amoral producer and executive we have ever dealt with. Just like they do to us on shows like Extra and sites like TMZ (owned by Warner Brothers.) Set up a website and tell the entire world, via the internet, your own anecdote about some of the witless boobs you have endured in Hollywood and beyond. The strike will end in a week.
Well, why don't I just fuck your girlfriend, Alec, in a bedroom right off the negotiating room. Really paper thin walls, and a headboard that slams into the wall as she moans and screams and cries out, gasping and calling my name.

Every couple of hours of negotiations we'll take a 30-45 minute break so the two of us can tear one off. She is, multi-orgasmic, right? Oh, don't worry; she will be. And during negotiations Alec, with you sitting over there with the Studio producers, she and I'll sit next to each other, almost in each other's laps, my hand dipping out of your sight under the table and she's wearing that oh so so short, short skirt. And you know she never wears panties Alex, as she and I smile at each other, barely even aware you're in the damn room.

This can go on for weeks as the lawyers negotiate.

What are we negotiating? Her sexual fidelity with you.

My hand out of sight, moving back and forth slowly, oh so slowly as her breathing deepens right there in the room right across the fucking table from you you stupid schmuck. Sometimes... Sometimes as she comes, gasping right there at the negotiating table, she'll look up and see you hopelessly watching her straight in the eye... and the bitch smiles. Because you know -- all this is just for Promotional Purposes.

Are you starting to get it Alec?

Every writer, every other major actor at least has the decency to shut the hell up if they're not with us, and everyone I have any respect for IS with us. Including your boss, Tina Fey.

So long as we're negotiating your girl friend's sexual fidelity, I don't ever, ever, EVER need to stop fucking her. Fucking and getting her off, in front of you. Three, four, five, eight times a day Alex, plus those extra little special moments where I make her breathe extra deep in the main room. Because as long as you're talking, you're not doing anything. So your girlfriend is mine.

As for your genuinely dumb-shit idea about insulting the executives of the Studios, didn't yelling at your daughter teach you ANYTHING?

Who do you think you are? Triumph, the Insult Comic Dog? Whose latest album is called, "Come Poop With Me!" (NSFW)

What are you, twelve?

Everything which has happened so far has only happened because the writers are behaving like grown-ups, asking for what is obviously a fair deal, and the Studio producers are behaving like spoiled 12 year-olds, throwing temper tantrums and refusing to share ANY of the pie with their brother and sister, when they didn't even bake the pie, pick the apples, peel the apples, or plant the tree. In fact, the producers can't even tell which kind of apple tastes best -- all pies are pretty much the same to them, but it doesn't stop them from trying to prevent anyone else from having a taste.

You, Alec, are acting just like the damn producers. Dumb. And disrespectful of the writers who write the lines you speak on the show that pays your salary.

Hey -- I've got an idea. Since you don't know what the fuck you're talking about, how about till the writers pick up their pencils again, what about you become...

There's more...

Wednesday, November 28, 2007

A True Should-Be Ought-to-be American


photo Frank Siteman/Allposters

Christopher Buchleitner, 9, Orphan, Reunited With His Dogs
Border Crosser Who Saved His Life -- Sent Back To Mexico

Thanksgiving night, nine-year old Christopher Buchleitner and his mother were driving home from a camping trip at Peña Blanca Lake near the Mexican border, 60 miles from Tucson.

And then everything went wrong...

Young Chris' father, Jack, had committed suicide several months previously on Labor Day. His mother, Dawn Alice Tomoko, lost control of their car, and went over a cliff. They landed 300 feet from the road. While mom was alive, she was trapped and dying. Christopher wiggled out of the car and started walking away -- in the cold desert night, all alone, down at the base of a cliff. Age nine.

Enter, stage left, a border crosser, Jesus Manual Cordova, 26. He was wandering through the desert. He came upon the boy. Together they returned to the car, comforted the dying mother whom they could not free, built a fire for warmth, and in the morning when hunters came upon them, the young boy and the young border crosser were both alive, as were the boy's dogs -- a golden retriever and a Queensland heeler.

The boy was dusted off to University Hospital in Tucson. The young man was taken by the Border Patrol to Nogales and let go -- on the Mexican side of the border.

If being a citizen is fundamentally the willingness to sacrifice yourself for the good of your community, Jesus Manual Cordova has met the test. Instead of continuing through the desert to freedom, he stopped and rendered aid, knowing the cost.

Any sane society would welcome this young man with open arms, the keys to the city, a full-ride to the University of Arizona, and a passport. The Republican-run Border Patrol shoved his brown-skinned ass right back over the border without even getting an address for the boy's family to write a thank-you card.

The boy is out of the hospital and has his beloved dogs back. He is currently with his uncle's family; whatever happens, he'll be with family we're told, and his dogs will stay with him.

Of Jesus Manual Cordova, there is no sign.

He has vanished into Mexico.

Or hopefully, walked back through the desert again, to a better life.

One final note... the young boy and the young man: they have the same birthday. Make of it what you will. Certainly, the border crosser made it possible that night for the boy to someday, many birthdays from now, become a man.

A man hopefully, as much a man as Jesus Manual Cordova.

There's more...

Monday, November 26, 2007

Not Everything Is A Republican Conspiracy


poster: The Secret Diagrams by Gerhard Seyfried (Click for LARGE.)

Karl Rove Isn't Behind Everything

I hate circular firing squads.

They serve no one but the enemy. And as Democrats, much more so than Republicans, who'll let Ann Coulter speak for them without saying anything, inviting her back over and over again, we of all people should perhaps learn not to shoot our own people over trivia.

The problem I have today, is I have a profound respect for the law. And a blog I actually like, even with their rhetorical excesses, ran a post last week, which is unmitigated crap. No one else called them out, so, I'm going to do it.

DownWithTyranny suggested that a recent D.C. Court of Appeals decision recently profiled in the Washington Post, was rigged so as to pay off for Republicans:

DownWithTyranny!

Bush's incompetent and overly partisan appointments to the courts have ruined the entire justice system of the United States and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia is now an outgrowth of the neo-nazi outfit known as the Federalist Society. They are making it impossible to prosecute the overt criminal activities of bribe-taking congressmen by abusing statutes "intended to protect legislators from intimidation under civil or criminal law."

The Federalist Society court has ruled the Justice Department can't use evidence against the crooked Republicans that was obtained through court-approved wiretaps, searches of home offices and voluntary interviews of congressional staffers. Of the 10 current members of the court, seven are rabid right wing fanatics appointed by Reagan, Bush, Sr and, mostly Bush, Jr, who allowed the Federalist Society to dictate each nominee, none of whom faced any serious opposition from a collaborationist Senate.
Wow, just reading this, one could almost believe the Federalist Society has taken over the D.C. Circuit, and this particular case was rigged.

Turns out not to be the case. (Go back and read The Washington Post article to grasp the actual issue.)

First however, let me just suggest we reserve calling anyone a "neo-nazi outfit" be reserved for people whom, like, are? Say the KKK, or the Aryan Brotherhood. Not a group of distinguished attorneys and judges, no matter how much you or I may hold many of their political views in contempt.

Second, learn to tell your judges apart. I went digging, and where I didn't know the answer, I wrote a letter and asked questions, dug around. This is one of those times I wish I could mention whom I spoke with, because I admire her/him a lot, as a distinguished legal scholar. But it was all off the record.

I'm going to paraphrase what my unnamed distinguished legal source told me on Thanksgiving Day:
It's a joke to think for a moment the D.C. Circuit decision was written for the benefit of Republicans. The author of the opinion was Judge Judith Rogers, nominated by Clinton, probably the most liberal member of the court. Judge Henderson who concurred, but refused to agree with the speech and debate clause part which is causing all the trouble for the DOJ, was nominated by Bush (41), and is moderate-conservative. It is almost certain the breakdown of the court's vote not to review the panel decision also did not break ideologically, given who was on the original panel. The very thought of Judge Rogers writing a decision to benefit Republicans is ridiculous, doubly so when a GOP-nominated judge went the opposite way. As is the thought of any judge on the court writing a decision to benefit corrupt politicians. These are judges.
Again; this is my paraphrase of my source, not a precise quote. And while I would have loved to have given credit, my original letter asking for help promised to keep her/his name off the record.

I agree with this assessment. I just didn't know the breakout of the judges, and while I could have looked them up, I didn't know how they might have, um, drifted... over the years. Which is why I had to go ask someone who knows them.

With all respect, the DownWithTyranny post was an idiot thing to write, and an embarrassment to liberalism.

It was stupid to write, because simple fact checking would have revealed the writer of the majority opinion was a Democrat, and the writer of the swing vote concurring with the majority but against the whole speech and debate clause section which is the problem for the Justice Department, was a Republican.

It embarrasses liberalism because it sticks us with goofy conspiracy nuts who see 9/11 in every government degree, voter fraud in every movement of a ballot box, and Karl Rove behind every reverse of every liberal idea everywhere. Sometimes, we just have our facts wrong, and we need to try very hard to not do that.

Will this ruling make things harder for the DOJ? Yes, most likely. That is why they are strongly considering appealing. But that is how rulings go sometimes.

The facts are, a Judge (nominated Democratic), expanded a privilege which may or may not be upheld at the Supreme Court level, if it gets that far. It was a close vote, and a Judge (nominated Republican) voted against expanding the critical part of expanding the privilege. Both of which are the precise opposite of how they would have voted if they were voting ideologically. The remainder of the Court split on non-partisan grounds as well.

There are enough actual attacks on our liberties, that we serve no one when we insist on inventing conspiracy theories everywhere.

Or as I was taught as a young paramedic student learning how to diagnose patients: "When you hear hoof beats outside your window, think of horses, not zebras."
There's more...

Sunday, November 25, 2007

Paid In Full

Awww Rudy, You Know Better! No Checks, Baby! CASH On The Dresser Tells No Tales!


The pundit backers of the Rudy Giuliani candidacy—backers who like to pride themselves on their plugged-inned-ness, and boast the same zeal in sniffing out trends as dogs have for sniffing at poop, are among the dumbest things going with opposable thumbs.

These knee-bruised pom-pom shakers would have you believe the spin they live by—that Rudolph W. Giuliani is some sort of worldly, ready for the big stage übermesch, prepared for any and all challenges a leader of the free world would ever have to face.

The flaming towers and collapsed fuckpad of 9-11 has forged this otherwise pasty, hate-able little martinet into a mighty leader of the West—with portfolio!

Slobber! Slobber! Slob—Gag-ghhhhhhk!

Wrong.

What Rudy Giuliani is is exactly what the great Jimmy Breslin called him out to be years ago—“A small man in search of a balcony.”

If you really look at Giuliani and the way he's conducted his “campaign” thus far, it should be evident that he's little more than a puffed-up, local politi-thug—used to bigfooting and bogarting his way around a much smaller pond than one that commands the national spotlight every day.

You can see it in his wan and cavalier campaign style. He acts as if he's still working NY's five boroughs—or rather, in his case—one city (Manhattan) and four wooden spokes on a glittering, golden hub. New York—cocooned, self-centered place that it is, in many ways deferred to Rudy's snarling and back-handing about. He cowed much of the press corps with denial of access, black-balling, and played a local version of the Bush “yer a traitor” game, where anyone who questioned his tactics was deemed anti-city, and down with the dusky hordes he was tossing into jail like so many grapes into his hungry mouth.

He grew used to the kid-glove treatment...until his second term, when his brand of Queegish crazy wore thin on even those who once deferred to him, and they actually started in on him for his ham-fisted brazenness.

It kicked him in the ass with his ugly handling of the “end” of his marriage, and his feeble, grasping linkage of that to his cancer diagnosis—thinking it would garner him sympathy from the press. It didn't. Pile that atop the rest of the second-term troubles that stripped his teflon veneer—his callousness after various acts of brutality by the storm-trooper wing of his NYPD, the mounting casualty list of commissioners he personally drove out thanks to his egocentric arrogance...even something as simple as a crazed, over-the-top, and unintentionally telling outburst at a ferret owner during a radio show, (via Oliver Willis and This American Life) and he was no longer “Fuck what you think...'I-can-get-away-with-anything' Rudy”.

Until September 11th that is. Still, what I call the luckiest day in his misbegotten life.

A pariah up until that point, the tragedy gave him a chance at that balcony Breslin spoke of—and Rudy stepped out onto it, practically jodhpured and high-booted, and played to the crowd beautifully. It pretty much worked. The local press quickly tired of his antics again, but it wasn't that “peanut gallery” he was playing to. Rudy was preening for the masses in back, and in the balconies. They ate it up for quite a while...enough that he thought that 9-11 and his “rehabilitation” had reset his relationship with the press back to its old, comfortable zero point where few would would check on his blustery pronouncements and daily dribble of white lies—small, medium, and some quite large.

He still has those braying pundit pals hype-manning for him. But the national press is too big and scattered to all fall in line. And because of that, you get an ugly, little exposé like this one from last week:

Rudy Giuliani has a firefighter problem. Following up on earlier criticism, a group of 9/11 family members and firefighters met on Monday at Dartmouth College to launch a campaign against the former New York City mayor and current Republican presidential candidate for what they deem to be massive failures before, during and after the attacks of 9/11.

But at least one member of the FDNY continues to offer his support to the former mayor -- and may be getting paid for it.

John R. Orlando, who serves with Engine 216 in Brooklyn, New York, has been cited prominently as a Giuliani supporter. Last June, in a New York Times article detailing the mixed reviews Giuliani has among the city's 11,000-membered firefighting force, Orlando said he regularly saw Giuliani at fires despite suggestions otherwise.

Orlando was also quoted as saying the “bottom line is, I think he's been more of a friend to firefighters than I've seen in the news. I don't think all the criticism is warranted.”

Did those comments come with a reward? Three months after he praised Giuliani, Orlando found himself on the former mayor's payroll. On September 28, 2007, the Giuliani campaign paid one John R. Orlando more than $1,580 for what they deemed on a campaign filing as “political strategy consulting.”


When asked about the arrangement -- after repeated attempts for comment -- Giuliani spokesperson Matt McKeon questioned the question.

“Are you suggesting that firefighters aren't capable of political strategy?”

Pressed to describe what strategy, exactly, Orlando provided, McKeon replied: “I'll get back to you.”

He never did. (emphasis from LM)

Orlando, who is still with the FDNY, was also reached via phone. He was asked for comment about both his consulting for Giuliani and his thoughts on why the former mayor has been poorly received among his fellow firefighters. Like McKeon, he too said he would reply at a later time and never did. (LM emphasis, again)


Mister 9-11 is such a friend of the firefighters that groups of them ally against him along with other 9-11 survivor families, swear vengeance against him, and the one firefighter who speaks the loudest for him, come to find out has been cashing a fucking check for his “support”.

Ohhhhhhh....that is rich!

This is the Rudy we know all too well in New York. The one who just did whatever-the-fuck and figured all was mellow-“d” and no one would check back on it. But checking back they are, and just like he's been entangled in the Regan shit-vortex, (again, more brazenness) he's snagged his sack in the ol' zipper-teeth again with this “bust”.

One that simply says...RUDOLPH GIULIANI IS REDUCED TO HAVING TO PAY FIREFIGHTERS TO SAY POSITIVE THINGS ABOUT HIM.

No dodge. Just feeble spin. Another stumble from a man revealing himself to the country as a political rank amateur.

And stagnating in the polls, and dropping in enough of them to shake him up, he's resorted to open, off-the-talking-points-reservation pleas for support based solely on his 9-11 “record”.

His base paper—The New York Post threw him under the snow-chained bus with that sarcastic “Mr. 9-11” headline story.

Distance first...then the long-distance knife toss in the back.

Ohhhhh, yes! Doin' great there, “R”. Life's just a bowl of tiny-tiara-ed cherries for you these days, huh?

And what are these days all about, my fine, razor-lipped friend?

Surprising, mocking “MR. 9-11” headlines from your usual propaganda mill, and the lovely exposé that you, RUDOLPH GIULIANI, IS REDUCED TO HAVING TO PAY FIREFIGHTERS TO SAY POSITIVE THINGS ABOUT YOU.

Damn.

Hope he's worth it, Rudy. All fifteen-hundred blood-soaked “Washingtons” you spent.

Cha-ching! Enjoy the video. :)

There's more...

Friday, October 26, 2007

“Stop! In the Name of Law”



The Supreme Stoppage

It's not 1965 anymore, Baby Love.

But you're still asking, "Where Did Our Love Go" as you tool around town in your hot new 2009 General Motors car, hoping she'll soon be Back in My Arms Again.

Ain't gonna happen.

In fact, the MAN is going to own your ass. He'll be saying, Come See About Me as he presses the magic button and your car goes stop.

All 1.7 million of them.

Live Science

General Motors plans to equip 1.7 million of its 2009 models with a system that allows OnStar operators to cut engine power in the car if the police request it. The system was demonstrated in Washington, D.C. today.

GM's OnStar system already contains built-in GPS tracking that would allow police to find any OnStar-equipped vehicle. With the new technology, if the police request it, an OnStar operator will inform the occupants of the vehicle and then cut power. The engine will be slowed to idle speed, to allow the driver to move to the side of the road. Brakes and other electrical functions of the vehicle will still work.

The intent of the system is to cut down on the number of police chases, which can be dangerous for both bystanders and police. A recent study showed that from 1994 through 2002, there were 2,654 crashes involving 3,965 vehicles and 3,146 fatalities during police pursuits.

GM also stated that the owner of the vehicle may opt out of the service upon request. GM's research has indicated that 95% of current OnStar subscribers would like to participate. Take a look at other initiatives to make the roads safer, like the prototype car seat and Nissan Pivo 2 in-dash robot, which try to detect drivers sleeping behind the wheel. Read an interview with Greg Bear about Quantico.
Oh yeah, just another way we're making your life safer.

The four horsemen of the internet:
  • Terrorism
  • Drugs
  • Child Porn
  • Racism & Hatred
In the name of these, we will reduce the greatest tool of communication ever invented, to that which is safe for a very stupid and protected five year-old with an unmedicated paranoid, religiously fanatical mother who was herself orphaned and repeatedly molested as a child, then abandoned on the street as a teenager where she was made pregnant by an unknown father while drunk, now looking over the five year-olds' shoulder, while Child Protective Services and the Drug Enforcement Agency quietly monitor everything and Homeland Security checks out using a root kit and the built-in camera and microphone, the obvious infiltration of our Homeland by the child (who has a brown skin.)

THIS is the world the nutcases would give us.

This is the world apparently, 95% of new GM drivers are fine to give the police -- the right to turn off your car remotely.

Raise your hand if you think the car:
  • will never be hacked,
  • never ever could be sold to someone trying to carjack your car or kidnap your kid (if you're rich), or
  • you trust the white cops following black and brown men to turn it off in a way which doesn't cause their car to take a dive under a semi-trailer.
  • Or no cop will ever turn off the car of a cute girl with the bigga ga-boombas. Late at night in a private, quiet place.
GM is turning out 1.7 million of these suckers.

Be a sucker. Buy from GM.
There's more...

Friday, October 19, 2007

Wal-Mart Defends Its Staff. Oh Wait, No, It Doesn't.


photo THR/JEFF GOULDING

Wal-Mart Customer Service Manager Fired After Being Assaulted By Shoplifter

I guess the Customer IS always right.

Even when right is defined as 18-year-old Angel Rivera of the City of Newburgh being:

  • gets caught shoplifting,
  • is offered a polite way out without any trouble,
  • Runs out of the store,
  • Runs back in and SCREAMS at the soon-to-be fired Manger,
  • Smashes a McDonald's drink on her shoulder,
  • "Landed a hard hook to her cheek",
  • Punched someone else in the eye,
  • Spit in someone else's face, and
  • "Pummeled another manager."
All before Ms. Rivera was hauled off to jail under arrest on "robbery and assault, felonies, and petty larceny." Security cameras having her dead to rights on the major charges.

Obviously this breach of Wal-Mart's peace and decorum calls for the firing of the woman who CAUSED IT ALL TO HAPPEN, the Customer Service Manager, Victoria Smith.

If only she'd had the good sense to just let the alleged thief steal from Wal-Mart, Ms. Rivera wouldn't have gone bat-shit fucking insane and assaulted FOUR people.

Thank Goodness Wal-Mart provides World-Class Health Care and Vacation benefits to all employees -- as behooves one of the world's largest and most profitable companies -- and trusts its employees and managers to do the right thing. I'm sure each of these people got adequate time off to heal from the attack, along with proper counseling, and that no one is being scapegoated in any way for the random attack of a criminal.

That crazy & quirky Wal-Mart. Always doing the right thing.

Someone should do a crazy & quirky network television show about a triangle of crazy & quirky kids who love, live and work at... Wal-Mart.

Call it, Well-Met@Wal-Mart, with Wally, Wendy & Wesley. Wednesdays.

Well?
There's more...

Wednesday, October 17, 2007

Do NOT Mess With An Original Gangsta

слово!

(or “Word!” in English)

It was June of 2001—yes, there was a world—an America before September 11th of that year, and George Bush, whose shiftlessness, arrogance, and balls-to-the-wall stupidity we were just beginning to glean took his very first meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin. It was in Slovenia for a summit, and Bush at his faux-empathetic best saw fit to let the whole world know what he thought of his Russian counterpart. In a move that should have been a red flag for the crazy to come, Bush went to his “faith healer” schtick and gave us his “sense” of the man via little more than a handshake and a look:

“I looked the man in the eye. I found him to be very straight forward and trustworthy and we had a very good dialogue.”

“I was able to get a sense of his soul.”


That was six years ago. An eon in diplomatic time—and an ever-loving eternity when you factor in 9-11.

Which brings us to today, a post 9-11 world where the landscape is radically different from those “soul-gazing” days of '01. A landscape featuring a topography of mingled Asian sand and Caspian ice —via AP:

He (Putin) also suggested Moscow and Tehran should have a veto on Western plans for new pipelines to carry oil and natural gas from the Caspian Sea, using routes that would bypass Russian soil and break the Kremlin's monopoly on energy deliveries from the region.

Putin came to Tehran for a summit of the five nations bordering the Caspian, but his visit was aimed more at strengthening efforts to blunt U.S. economic and military ties in the area. Yet he also refused to set a date for completing Iran's first nuclear reactor, trying to avoid an outright show of support for Iran's defiance over its nuclear program.


Putin strongly warned outside powers against use of force in the region, a clear reference to the United States, which many in Iran fear will attack over the West's suspicions that the Iranians are secretly trying to develop nuclear weapons.

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad made similar comments.
"We are saying that no (Caspian) nations should offer their territory to outside powers for aggression or any military action against any of the Caspian states," Putin said.
The five national leaders at the summit later signed a declaration that included a similar statement — an apparent reflection of Iranian fears that the United States could use Azerbaijan's territory as a staging ground for military strikes in Iran.
Putin has warned against such attacks previously, but reiterating them in Tehran gave them greater resonance — particularly at a summit for a region where Moscow deeply resents U.S. and European attempts at greater influence.

-------------------------------------------

At the same time, Putin — on the first trip to Iran by a Kremlin leader since Josef Stalin visited in 1943 for talks with Winston Churchill and Franklin D. Roosevelt during World War II — said Moscow wouldn't back down on its obligation to finish the plant.

"Russia has clearly stated that it's going to complete this work," Putin said. "We are not renouncing this obligation."


Cue the big brain on Driftglass:

Hmm. Where have I seen this before? Nuclear states with imperial ambitions?

Taking a rooting, tampering interest in countries with strategically valuable resources?

Countries which can trade geopolitical importance for power and prestige, and through which their dominant partner nations can carry out a cold, proxy war at a safe distance?

Oh yeah.

So meet the












New War...



...same as the












Cold War.




He hammers the nail through the wall, into the neighbors' apartment and through the back of mama's old breakfront. Bush (and his imperialist handlers) were so dead set on treating Iran like a wet food stamp that there was almost no way this Putin/Ahmadinejad love connection wasn't gonna go down—especially after the shitty treatment he got here in New York during his visit. Now, no one is saying that we should have extended to Ahmadinejad the tender courtesies that Mickey Kaus does to his goat friends, but one would have to be a fool to see that Putin's perfectly-timed, and historically-destined cuddle wouldn't be a result of the U.S.'s ham-fisted non-diplomacy. And while a cuddle it may be, the arms of said Caspian cuddle-er while capable of the gentle diplomatic caress we're seeing now, are just as capable of and ready to casually snap the neck of anybody who really pisses him off.

Which leads us to the crux of this situation...which Hubris lays out succinctly:

He wants to make it clear to Bughouse Dick that if he moves against Iran there will be consequences. We have seen this whacky topic of invading Iran ebb and flow based on the level of Dick's meds recently. Hopefully this message from Pooty Poot will quiet down the trained monkeys about invading Iran.

Russia is the only country that is helping Iran to realize its nuclear program in a peaceful way, he said.


If you want to keep it that way Richard, keep your trap shut...


As a public service to the President and Vice-President, I'm gonna lay this out for you real simple-like.

DO. NOT. FUCK. AROUND. WITH. VLADIMIR. PUTIN.

Okay?

Now, I know you want to fuck with him, but let's be clear—he ain't like you. Meaning, that for all the tough talk you guys have spit out over the years with the aid of handlers and broadcast transmitters hidden in your suit jackets, this son-of-a-bitch—Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin walked the walk—and probably shot the bullets, and car-batteried the gonads of people who got in his way.

Actually did it, okay?

To you, Mr. President, Putin was in the KGB when it was your daddy's job to see to it that as many members of that organization ended up face-down in Gorky Park with poisoned shivs in their backs. And it was Putin's job to make sure he piano-wired the carotid arteries of anyone trying to poison-shiv his KGB buddies. You ducked conflict. This guy dipped it in his borscht and ate it, happily.

And to you, Mr. Cheney, for all your diabolical thinking, your hand-rubbing and mordant chuckles over evil plans set in motion via dark-roomed, “cigarette-smoking man” calls from you, understand that Putin worked as the kind of low-level spook who handled the dirtiest of the dirty work. Tail a guy, brace him, beat the living shit out of him, dope him up, torch his place, torch his nads. He's everything you are—minus the innate cowardice to actually do the evil with his bare hands. Say what you will, but that does something to a man. It's what separates a button pusher, from a trigger man. And that trigger-man runs the only place that has near as many nukes as we do.

You see, there are “Original Gangstas”, and there are “Posers”. Kind of like the whole Tupac Shakur and Suge Knight paradigm. “Pac”, as he was called, was in essence a master showman. A more than capable actor who could put across the image and superficial trappings of the toughest of the tough street hoods. He played this role on record, to the press, and very convincingly on film. If you didn't look at him too close, he could easily scan as the the living embodiment of the image he portrayed.

But an image is all it was. For all his bluster and “Thug Life” tats, and gangsta-talk, Pac, in spite of some troubled family surroundings wasn't a “thug” or a tough guy at all. He went to art school. He studied poetry, jazz, acting and ballet. Performed Shakespeare to boot. By the time he was twenty he'd read Salinger and Melville, and the feminist works of Alice Walker and Robin Morgan.

A “Thug”? Hardly.He got his big break dancing behind Humpty-Hump in Digital Undergorund—not from taking nine, or nine-hundred bullets “Fiddy-Cent— style. (he caught a couple of slugs and checked himself out of a hospital hours after a minor scuffle once) And once given light, he adopted the “Thug Life” mantra, lifestyle and requisite attitude as a performer's persona. A performer's persona.

Now, his “buddy” Marion “Suge” Knight is a different story altogether. The 300 lb. monster rolled with Compton's vicious Mob Piru Bloods gang as a teen. The “Bloods” of drive-by killing fame. Suge would use his hulking size eventually nab a football scholarship to UNLV, and from there to “bodyguard” jobs for stars which he'd eventually parlay into a career in “concert promotion”—that usually ended up with disagreeing parties being broken and bloodied in an alley somewhere off Crenshaw Avenue. And eventually, he wound up in trouble with the law over the relatively minor issues of grand theft auto, concealed weapons and attempted murder charges. Had a restraining order put on him for cutting off a girlfriend's ponytail in front of her home. Capped a dude twice with a hot .38. Broke another guy's jaw pistol-whippin' him.

Suge was NOT an actor. He was the real. The awful, ugly, deadly and down-and-dirty real.

And in this world, you have your wannabe gangstas...of the “Pac”—for all his “talent”—mold, and the Original Gangstas of the just-as-soon-as-shoot-you-as-hand-you-a-cigar Suge Knight mold.

Bush and Cheney fall into the “Pac” camp. They can talk a good game but have no real “record” to stand on. Putin is in the “Suge” school, with a trail of broken and non-breathing bodies behind him. Bush and Cheney rat-fuck. Putin, as we've seen in the case of Alexander Litvinenko will rat-poison a mother-fucker.

There's one hell of a difference between the two. And as we saw on that fateful night in that parking lot in Las Vegas, one dude walked away from the gunfire, and one wound up on a slab. Guess who did what.

You might—Mssrs. Bush and Cheney take a lesson from that. You've been verrry successful as posers for all your lives. You've parlayed it into great personal success. But you need to check your bullshit at the door when you're dealing with an “O.G” (Original Gangsta) like Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin. You said you “looked into his eyes and saw his soul”. John McCain, for all his silliness noted the other day that when he looked into Putin's eyes, he saw three letters: “K.G.B.” It's a quip. A nifty sound-bite. But John McCain probably knows a shitload more about what it looks like staring into a hard, brutal man's eyes than Bush and Cheney ever will. Putin's got the icy look of a man who's seen life ebb out of more than a couple people, and more than a couple of times directly because of him.

One last thing. When I was a teenager, there was a little deli/grocery store in my neighborhood called “Slim's”. And as is often the case, a name like “Slim” is given to a fella who is not that. The proprietor—“Slim”—was a man-mountain. six-foot-five and about 270 lbs. None of it fat. Arms like picnic roasts. Hands like baseball mitts. Big, southern fella with a “Paw” from the “Hillbilly Bears” countenance. Wore overalls all the time, and had a huge burn welt on his right upper arm—just below a faded, crude green Marine Corps bulldog tattoo. Said he got the burn when a dude attacked him with an arc welder. He never said what happened to the dude...and he didn't have to.

Anyways, one day I'm in his store, and there's a real jerk at the counter harassing one of Slim's daughters at the register. Lewd, chattering about everything, being a general nuisance. He hands her a five-dollar bill for his purchase amidst his distracting patter, and then upon receiving his change, went ballistic, claiming that he'd given her a twenty and that she was stiffing him. I know it was a fiver, as I was standing behind him for five minutes practically watching his every annoying move. She corrected him—“No, you gave me a five. I put it right here.” He countered with curses, threats, counter-pounding and demands that she give him change he wasn't entitled to. When I heard her call out to the back room “Daddy!”, I knew it was all over.

Slim lumbered from the back, ducking his head at the short doorway, and the clown at the counter, who evidently was pulling a scam and had never been in the store before—and didn't know who he was fucking with continued with his invective. “Oh, now you gonna call this mother-fucker out here? Who the fuck is you? Who the fuck is you?”, he railed.

“You need to calm down, kid. Watch your mouth in my store.”, Slim rumbled. “And don't be bothering my daughter.”

“Fuck your daughter!”, the idiot yelled as I took a step or two back. “She gypped me! I gave her a twenty, she's saying I gave her a five! I want my Goddamn change! All of it!”

“Baby, what did he give you?”

“A-a five”, she stammered.

“We don't be gypping people who come in here, mister. I been here twenty years and we don't do that. I think you made a mistake.”

I made a mistake?”, the guy screamed. “No, this is a mistake!” And with that, he upset a jar of pickles that was on the counter, tipping it over and as it wasn't 100% sealed, spilling pickle brine all over the counter.

“Mister...I ain't no play-toy.” Slim intoned. And he threw a couple of paper towels at the guy. “You need to wipe that up, right now.”

“Yeah, well I want my fuckin' change right now! All of it! Right now!”

And with that, I heard—I didn't see because it was too damned fast—Slim whip one of those baseball-mitt hands out and grab this dude by the clavicle. The other hand hit the guy's hip, and with one quick motion, Slim yanked him into the air, and slammed him down hard onto the counter with a “BOOM!” that shook the gum rack and penny-candy boxes.

He had the guy pinned in an unnatural position that looked for certain to snap his neck if he kept him like that for long. The man's face was pressed hard against the brine-soaked countertop.

“I told YOU, I ain't no Goddamned play-toy! I gave you a chance to wipe that shit up—now you're gonna lick it up! NOW LICK IT UP!. Sure as shootin', homeboy started to loll his tongue out and lick at the liquid like some sort of spine-twisted cat at a bowl. “Annnh! Annnh! Annnnh!” he went, lapping up the spillled brine as Slim moved him about like a human dishrag.

“I told-you-what-to-do, but-you-didn't-wanna-listen, did-you? Now-look-at-cha! Told-you-I-wasn't-no-Goddamn-play-toy, right? Huh? I-didn't-hear-you? Am-I-a-Goddamned-play-toy?” “Annnh! Annnh! Annn-n-n-n-n-n-h!” was the throttled response again.

The correct answer of course, was “no”. Slim was absolutely not a “play-toy”. Certain people you'll come across in life are just not. And Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin is one of those people. An “Original Gangsta”, if you will.

You don't just fuck around with folks like that. And the absolute worst thing you can do is “play” tough guy with them when you don't have the pedigree for it. Take heed the tales of “Pac”, and “Suge”, of “Slim” and “The Counter-Licker”, and if you have any sense at all, Mr. Bush and Mr. Cheney, you'll go to the phones before you even think of going to the generals.

'Cause from what I remember seeing, being forced to lick up pickle brine ...is an absolute bitch.
There's more...

Monday, October 15, 2007

Rat-Fucking in Arizona

Little Hispanic boy dressed in white, waving American flag, standing on bench in classroom of immigrants waiting to become U.S. citizens; 1996 photo by CNN
photos by CNN

Naive Immigrants' Dreams of U.S. Citizenship Raped

I am extraordinarily careful how I use the word rape.

Assholes in Arizona are raping the hopes and dreams of naive immigrants to this country, in the lingo, "rat-fucking" them.

When it is over, even though the immigrants don't know it yet, they are never going to be U.S. citizens.

"Take that, wetback, and shove it up your greasy ass."

Here's how the scam works.

STEP #1

Blog For Arizona

Maricopa County Recorder Elections Office has learned that an insidious fraud is being perpetrated upon legal immigrants living in Arizona. Apparently, unscrupulous people are going through the telephone book and finding people with Hispanic surnames and are calling them up or visiting their homes and asking them if they are interested in becoming U.S. citizens. If they answer yes, or say that they have started the process, these victims are told that the first step to becoming a citizen is to register to vote.

Plainly, this is untrue. You cannot legally register to vote until you have become a U.S. citizen.

A large number of innocent people are believing this story and are providing all of the information needed to complete a registration form. There are also cases where the victim is never spoken to but the information entered into the registration form is taken just from the telephone book. Even with this incomplete information, the forms are completed anyway, often using false signatures, invented birth dates and drivers license numbers.

These faked forms are then turned to the Maricopa County Elections office. At this point, the names and addresses of these victims are put into the County's system and then checked for validity, at which point the forms are rejected.
Bad enough in its own right.

The immigrant has unwittingly committed a felony. Attempted voter fraud.

All the bullshit about needing ID to visit the polls, which of course, many older people and homeless people don't have, which disenfranchises them while suppressing Democratic Party votes, this is tailor-made to support the Republican attempts to keep low-income and minorities away from the ballot box. Not that there is any indication people registering to vote falsely is any type of genuine problem.

Unless you're Ann Colter.

But that's just ordinary voter fraud. And with a good lawyer -- as if an immigrant trying to become a citizen wants to deal with the law and felony charges, and wouldn't be inclined perhaps to just give up their dreams rather than face down the Prosecutor's office -- could probably make a case they were duped. Especially given a string of these are turning up.

Probably. Maybe. Perhaps.

But then, the truly ugly part kicks in. The rat-fucking.

Step #2
Any person who begins the process of becoming a legal U.S. citizen must obtain from their County Recorder a letter that they have never attempted to register to vote and provide it ICE. If the recorder finds them in the system, they cannot provide that letter, which means that person will likely never become a U.S. citizen, and could be charged with a felony.

So even though these victims may be here with legal documents, because some unscrupulous person is trying to earn $4 or $6 for each registration they turn in, or is trying to create voter fraud where none exists, they are destroying someone's dream of becoming a U.S. citizen.
Five years later.

Eight years later.

101 year old woman waving American flag, waiting to become U.S. citizen; 1996 photo by CNNWhenever the paperwork is due to ICE, the knife falls. Along with a possible felony charge, depending on how generous Maricopa County feels that month.

A family who has taken care to take every single step right. Their visa, their green card, their attorney, all of the paperwork just so... blown out of the water and possibly across the border by some Arizona asshole destroying lives.

Racist fucks.

A friend of mine is a Priest who has lived outside Tucson for over 30 years. He leaves water for people crossing the desert. I've been on the peripheries of the Sanctuary movement (which started in Tucson) since I was a young medic in South Tucson.

Over 1,000 people a day are turned back in the Tucson sector attempting to make the crossing. Since October 1 a year ago, 204 people have died in the Tucson sector attempting the crossing. And obviously -- and typically ignored by the racist Republicans for whom all Hispanics faces are the same -- many, many Hispanics are in the United States completely legally, on valid visas from the very start of their stay. Not to mention the tens of millions of U.S. citizens of Hispanic decent, or people from South and Central America, or from Europe.

To come so far, to work honestly to do everything legally, to become an American citizen, only to be told "No" by an actively anti-immigrant governmental bureaucracy which assumes the validity of all charges against the immigrant, which looks for reasons to reject citizenship applications.

All because some Arizona asshole raped -- rat-fucked -- an immigrant family years ago in their naivety.

This is beyond ugly.

This is evil.
There's more...

Friday, October 12, 2007

Administration Ads Advocate Abstinence



“Throw it out with the trash”

The West Wing: Take Out the Trash Day
(Season 1, Episode 13)
CUT TO:

INT. OUTER OVAL OFFICE - DAY

Bartlet comes in and approaches Mrs. Landingham.

BARTLET
Mrs. Landingham.

MRS. LANDINGHAM
Yes sir?

BARTLET
You're not going to believe this but
I think I'd actually like a banana.

MRS. LANDINGHAM
I'm afraid not sir, no.

BARTLET
Why not?

MRS. LANDINGHAM
You were offered one earlier, sir,
and you were snippy.

BARTLET
I wasn't snippy!

MRS. LANDINGHAM
I'm afraid you were, Mr. President.
[looking toward the oval office]
C.J.'s waiting, sir.

BARTLET
Thank you, Mrs. Landingham.

He crosses into THE OVAL OFFICE and shuts the door.

BARTLET
She withholds food from me.

C.J.
Mr. President, I hate to keep
jumping up and down on this, but...

BARTLET
The sex-ed report.

C.J.
Yes sir.

BARTLET
We're gonna leave it alone
for a while.

C.J.
Sir, when you say...

BARTLET
[busy at his desk]
After the midterm elections.

C.J.
That's a year from now.

BARTLET
Yeah.

C.J.
We're gonna stick it in a drawer?

BARTLET
It's a pretty incendiary report.

C.J.
You don't think we have an obligation
to present the information?

BARTLET
[crosses out to stand in front of her]
It's not gonna play well at a
PTA meeting. It says
we should be teaching
kids to have sex.

C.J.
It does not, Mr. President, excuse
me sir, but it does not.

BARTLET
Of course it doesn't. But that's
how it's going to play.

C.J.
The report is very direct, sir,
it says with holding knowledge
about having sex doesn't
prevent teenagers from having sex,
it prevents teenagers from having
sex safely. And it says offering
information about safe sex doesn't
increase the rate of sex, it increases
the rate of protected sex.

BARTLET
[in a somewhat patronizing tone]
C.J.

C.J.
We commissioned this report, Mr. President.
These people are doctors; we asked them a
question. How can we put it in a drawer
just cause we don't think people are going to
like the answer?

BARTLET
C.J., getting it through this congress,
a body which at the moment, will only
give federal funding to sex education
programs that teach abstinence only.

C.J.
We have an enormous pulpit from which...

BARTLET
[raising his voice]
And we will avail ourselves of that
pulpit but we will do it after
the midterm elections.

C.J.
[a pause, realizes]
I think I understand.

BARTLET
I needed to get Leo off the hook, C.J.

C.J.
It's the deal Josh and Sam made.

BARTLET
Yes. We'll deal with it after
the midterm elections.

C.J.
I understand.

BARTLET
[back behind his desk]
I was hoping you would.

C.J.
Yes, sir. Yes, sir.
Umm, several members of the press
already know, I think, the report
came back to us and...

BARTLET
Yeah. Well there's nothing wrong
with telling them we got it. I wouldn't
make a big deal out of it. We got it,
we're looking at it, we're studying it.
Throw it out with the trash.

C.J.
Yes sir.

BARTLET
Thanks, C.J.

C.J.
Thank you sir.
[almost out the door, but stops and
turns back to face Bartlet]
Mr. President? We could all be better teachers.

BARTLET
I know.

C.J. leaves, as Bartlet removes his glasses, looking pensive.

In April 2007, the Bush Administration buried Impacts for Title V. Section 510, Abstinence Education Programs: Final Report, the report they commissioned on abstinence-only education which said...

IT DOESN'T WORK.

The Bush's threw it out with the trash.
The RH Blog

The news for the Bush Adminstration's abstinence-only policies just seems to be getting worse, some might liken it to a swiftly sinking boat or ship.

So a burial at sea is appropriate, and by releasing the latest federal report on abstinence-only, Impacts for Title V. Section 510, Abstinence Education Programs: Final Report, from Mathematica Policy Research, Inc. late on a Friday, that is exactly what the Bushies are doing.

“After 10 years and $1.5 billion in public funds these failed abstinence-only-until-marriage programs will go down as an ideological boondoggle of historic proportions,” said James Wagoner, President of Advocates for Youth.

“The tragedy is not simply the waste of taxpayer dollars, it is the damage done to the young people who have been on the receiving end of distorted, inaccurate information about condoms and birth control. We have been promoting ignorance in the era of AIDS, and that’s not just bad public health policy, its bad ethics”.

“This report should serve as the final verdict on the failure of the abstinence-only industry in this country,” said William Smith, vice president for public policy of the Sexuality Information and Education Council of the U.S. (SIECUS). “It shows, once again, that these programs fail miserably in actually helping young people behave more responsibly when it comes to their sexuality,” Smith continued.

Teenagers have sex.

With or without education, with or without promising to be pure, teenagers have sex.

The study found many kids (the fundies) tried to stay “pure” -- so they experimented.

This is how they experimented. (Slightly NSFW [words.])

But no...

Even though there is massive evidence it has never worked, the Bush Administration is running a national ad campaign promoting abstinence-only.

What next? Mediation over oil rights in Iraq?

I think the government should consider this special Mother-Daughter vibrator moment instead. (With a hell of a back story. *sighs*)

Oh wait... vibes are illegal to purchase in Alabama. Thanks U.S. Supreme Court. (We miss you Justice O'Connor.)
There's more...

Thursday, October 11, 2007

Bad Cop


art by Matt Groening: Clancy Wiggum/The Simpsons

Cop Falls, Breaks Knee During Rescue of Drowning Baby
Cop Sues Brain-Damaged Baby's Family for Water on Floor

Really... You read that right.

A cop who went to help rescue a drowning one-year, slipped in a puddle made while dragging the nearly-dead child from the pool.

She blames the family of the brain-damaged breathing-through-a-tube kid for not making their pool baby-proof, thus leading to the chain of events where she fell.

Orlando Sentinel

In January, 1-year-old Joey Cosmillo wandered into the backyard and fell into the family pool. When his mother hauled him out, he wasn't breathing. Rescuers were able to bring him back to life, but he suffered severe brain damage and cannot walk, talk or even swallow.

Now, his family faces another burden: One of the rescuers, Casselberry police Sgt. Andrea Eichhorn, is suing, alleging the family left a puddle of water on the floor that afternoon, causing her to slip and fall.

The boy's grandparents, named in the suit, are mystified and angry.

"The loss we've suffered, and she's seeking money?" said Richard Cosmillo, 69, the boy's grandfather. "Of course there's going to be water in the house. He was sopping wet when we brought him in."

Eichhorn last week sued Richard Cosmillo; his wife, Maggie Cosmillo; and the boy's mother, Angela Cosmillo, accusing them of negligence. They were careless, according to the suit, and allowed the home they shared to become unsafe.

As a consequence, Eichhorn broke her knee, something that kept her off the job for two months, according to police Chief John Pavlis.

The baby's mother was the only one home Jan. 9, when the boy slipped out of the house and wound up in the pool, according to a police report.

She plunged in and dragged him out, carrying him inside, down a hallway and into a bedroom. She also called 911.

Eichhorn arrived a few minutes later. As she stepped into the room where rescuers were working on the boy, she slipped and went down on one knee, then stood back up, according to Richard Cosmillo.

Eichhorn, a 12-year department veteran, would not discuss the suit. Her attorney said those benefits, paid by the city's workers' compensation carrier, were not enough. The suit seeks an unspecified amount of money.

Eichhorn, he said, is a victim. Her knee aches, and she will likely develop arthritis.

If the Cosmillos had made their pool baby-proof, police would not have been called to the scene, there would have been no water on the floor, and Eichhorn would not have hurt herself, he said.

"It's a situation where the Cosmillos have caused these problems, brought them on themselves, then tried to play the victim," he said.
In my entire career as a paramedic, I never heard anything like this.

What a loser.

What part of "to protect and to serve" doesn't she understand?

Hopefully this gets tossed on public policy grounds by the courts. Otherwise people could end up afraid to dial 911 if it exposes them to lawsuits from the cops, firefighters and medics responding. Paging Professor Volokh & the Volokh Conspiracy. *waves hello to youngest conspirator Madeline Joyce Rorick Adler*

I can't get over what an absolute ass this cop is.

She wouldn't dare try this bullshit in New York City. Someone would break her other knee. And in Oakland, someone would just cap her.
There's more...

Friday, October 5, 2007

10 Seconds in Maryland



Baby v. Maryland -- When No May Not Mean No

Tuesday, the Maryland Court of Appeals heard arguments in Baby v. Maryland to determine if consensual sex becomes rape if a woman says no in the middle of the sex act.

In October 2006, The Court of Special Appeals overturned a 2003 rape conviction, holding there is no rape under Maryland law if the woman consents to sex prior to penetration and then withdraws the consent after penetration.

This is what the reaction was almost a year ago to the Court of Special Appeals ruling:

The Happy Feminist

The court insists that since Battle provides the only indication of Maryland law on the issue, that the dicta in Battle must carry the day.

The court further admits that the law as stated in Battle is predicated on utterly antiquated, outdated, and grotesque notions of the status and personhood (or lack thereof) of women. As the court stated:

The concept, undergirding the Battle holding, rooted in ancient laws and adopted by the English common-law, views the initial "de-flowering" of a woman as the real harm or insult which must be redressed by compensating, in legal contemplation, the injured party -- the father or husband . . .

. . . [I]t was the act of penetration that was the essence of the crime of rape; after this initial infringement upon the responsible male's interest in a woman's sexual and reproductive functions, any further injury was considered to be less consequential. The damage was done. It was this view that the moment of penetration was the point in time, after which a woman could never be "re-flowered," that gave rise to the principle that, if a woman consents prior to penetration and withdraws consent following penetration, there is no rape. Maryland adheres to this tenet, having adopted the common law, which remains the law of the Land until and unless changed by the State's highest court or by statute . . .

The court elucidates further the reasons for the law in effect TODAY in Maryland in footnote 6 of the opinion:

The cultural mores undergirding the notion that the crime of rape was complete upon penetration may be traced to Biblical and Middle, Assyrian Laws: Under MAL, the rape of a virgin was presumed to be an illegal trespass upon the father's property with the rapist required to "give the (extra) third in silver to her father as the value of a virgin (and) her ravisher shall marry her (and) not cast her off." The woman was required to marry her rapist without hope of divorce. If the rapist was married, the virgin still had to marry her rapist; however, the rapist's property, his wife, was also factored into the compensation. The rapist's wife was to be given to the father "to be ravished . . .not to return her to her husband (but) to take her."

This approach to rape developed because a virgin was considered a valuable asset, the value residing in men's ability to gain absolute ownership of the totality of her sexual and reproductive functions. Any infringement upon this totality through premarital sexual relations rendered the asset less valuable and might even turn it into a liability.

(Emphasis added).

Feel free to read the entire decision (have your barf bag handy.)

Now we'll see what the highest court in Maryland has to say.
Baltimore Sun

Arguing for the state before the Court of Appeals, State's Attorney Sarah Page Pritzlaff said that when there is force, the act qualifies as rape.

"You clearly have the element of force, you have the resistance by the victim, the victim was quite clear that it was hurting, that she wanted him to stop."

Defense attorney Michael R. Malloy argued that if intercourse is consensual under existing common law it can't be rape. He argued that the jury that convicted had faulty instructions from the judge.

The Maryland attorney general's office asked the court to take up the case after a court of special appeals overturned a 2003 rape conviction. That conviction dates to the trial of a boy who was 16 when accused of raping an 18-year-old community college student in her car on Dec. 13, 2003. Maouloud Baby was convicted a year later in Montgomery County of first-degree rape and other crimes -- some from helping his 15-year-old friend assault the young woman first -- and sentenced to 15 years in prison, with all but five of those years suspended.

The victim, who had met Baby that night, testified at the trial that she told him that "as long as he stops when I tell him to" she would have sex with him.

As he began, she told him to stop because he was hurting her, but he kept going for five or 10 seconds, she said.
Certainly any person has the right to withdraw consent during sex.

I read the decision of the Court of Special Appeals when it came out.

They are full of shit.

Courts have to follow the rule of law; that's why we have courts. What this court did however wasn't following the rule of law. It was legal horse-shit, a bunch of men following each other over a cliff rushing to uphold a man's privilege to treat women as chattel. It is simply wrong as a matter of law. I am cautiously optimistic the Maryland Court of Appeals will get it right.

If that fails, it is up to the legislature (and public pressure) to change the law. Which is precisely how the system is designed to work. (The legislature hasn't done a damn thing in the year this has been on their plate. Not a good sign. It's a man's privilege to fuck a woman any damn time he wants in Maryland. Always has been, always will be.)

As for the 10 seconds. In the throes of passion, I think 10 seconds is about the time a reasonable man -- one who perhaps was near la petite mort -- could reasonably take (5 to 10 seconds) to hear her saying "No" or "Stop", come back to earth, understand what she's saying, and indeed, get the fuck out of her. Including possibly double-checking she's saying "No" instead of "Oh, no, oh..." Sure, we'd hope he's not so damn selfishly focused on his own pleasure he isn't noticing how she's doing, but obviously that's not always so.

Ten seconds... as a rule? Bright-line rules don't work here. It's got to be a totality of the circumstances. Change your mind in the middle? Absolutely and always.

This specific case? You bet your ass it was rape. She didn't want to be with him to start and only gave grudging consent to begin with. Then the little bastard didn't stop when she said to, even though she was clearly crying out in pain. This was, without question, rape.

I hope the Maryland Court of Appeals gets it right, not just because of the case, but so that women of Maryland will know the law in their State no longer considers rape to be --
The initial "de-flowering" of a woman as the real harm or insult which must be redressed by compensating, in legal contemplation, the injured party -- the father or husband . . .

. . . [I]t was the act of penetration that was the essence of the crime of rape; after this initial infringement upon the responsible male's interest in a woman's sexual and reproductive functions, any further injury was considered to be less consequential.
Gah!!!
There's more...