Thursday, June 26, 2008

Breaking: Heller Affirmed

Glock 19.
Glock 19.

People have an individual right to have a gun.

Justice Scalia writes for the majority.

SCOTUSblog

Answering a 127-year old constitutional question, the Supreme Court ruled on Thursday that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to have a gun, at least in one’s home. The Court, splitting 5-4, struck down a District of Columbia ban on handgun possession.

Justice Antonin Scalia’s opinion for the majority stressed that the Court was not casting doubt on long-standing bans on carrying a concealed gun or on gun possession by felons or the mentally retarded, on laws barring guns from schools or government buildings, and laws putting conditions on gun sales.

More follows...
They are going APESHIT at the NRA today.

This is their goddamn dream.

Quotes from the majority Opinion.
SCOTUSblog

“Logic demands that there be a link between the stated purpose and the command.”

We start therefore with a strong presumption that the Second Amendment right is exercised individually and belongs to all Americans.”

the most natural reading of ‘keep Arms’ in the Second Amendment is to “have weapons.”

The term was applied, then as now, to weapons that were not specifically designed for military use and were not employed in a military capacity.”

Putting all of these textual elements together, we find that they guarantee the individual right to possess and carry weapons in case of confrontation.

“Thus, we do not read the Second Amendment to protect the right of citizens to carry arms for any sort of confrontation, just as we do not read the First Amendment to protect the right of citizens to speak for any purpose.”

The prefatory clause does not suggest that preserving the militia was the only reason Americans valued the ancient right; most undoubtedly thought it even more important for self-defense and hunting.”

It was plainly the understanding in the post-Civil War Congress that the Second Amendment protected an individual right to use arms for self-defense.”

Like most rights, the right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited.”

Although we do not undertake an exhaustive historical analysis today of the full scope of the Second Amendment, nothing in our opinion should be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms.”

We also recognize another important limitation on the right to keep and carry arms. Miller said, as we have explained, that the sorts of weapons protected were those ‘in common use at the time.’ 307 U. S., at 179.”

Read that last graph again...

We also recognize another important limitation on the right to keep and carry arms. Miller said, as we have explained, that the sorts of weapons protected were those ‘in common use at the time.’ 307 U. S., at 179.”

No machine guns (the Gatling Gun wasn't invented till 1861), no military-grade weapons.

Read literally, the majority says, yes, individuals have an individual right to the weapons ‘in common use at the time.’ At the time of the revolution? Or now?

I need to read further, but I think -- these are originalists after all -- they mean the weapons in use 220 years ago. Heh.

Wouldn't that just frost the NRA's chops?

The good news is, weapons for everyone.
Bad news is, black powder single shot smooth bore.

*laughs*